It’s a zit! I wasn’t nowhere near that guy December 22, 2006
Posted by daveintexas in terrorist hemorrhoids.trackback
To what lengths may you go to collect evidence of a crime?
The lunatic bullet, is in my head.
I blame Bush.
Daylight Savings Time is Here!
To what lengths may you go to collect evidence of a crime?
The lunatic bullet, is in my head.
I blame Bush.
That dude will get high and have his homey Du Wayne do some amateur surgery. No way is he going to have that bullet removed from his head by the Policemens.
RG,
It’s a bullet, maybe they can shoot it out?
I vote…. uh… Pickaxe.
From the article:
Tammie Bush, the teen’s mother, disputed allegations her son is a gang member.
“We know he’s not a criminal,” she said. “He’s a good kid.”
From Myron:
Aint they all? According to the Rule of Mamma’s there ain’t a criminal in the system. They’re all “good kids”.
No racisism intended, but did you use photoshop on the whites if his eyes?….They’re to white, even for a cracker like me
it’s “too” white, not “to”, and no, I just copied the pic from the article.
click the link.
it’s “too” white, not “to”,
*in which Dave reveals his Inner Michael*
Man Fights To Keep Bullet In His Head That Links Him To Shooting
While police seek to have it removed, to be used as evidence….
Magnets, damm huge powerful magnets. Nonintrusive, and perfectly legal (I looked it up).
Alear, that is a beautiful idea in its simplicity and effectiveness. Of course, we must make sure there is an uninterrupted and perpetual supply of electricty to the magnet.
I thought bullets were made of lead. Magnets won’t to anything. Lead poisoning is a slow killer though.
Jeez; haven’t they already pretty much got him nailed as an accessory and probably on conspiracy (i.e. he talked about it with the others before they did it), even if they can’t prove that he was the shooter? And even without the bullet, any prosecutor worth a crap ought to be able to convince a jury — even the O.J. jury — that the kid’s story just don’t add up.
Which leads me to two questions: (1) How does a 9mm bullet hit someone in the forehead and just get lodged in fatty tissue without penetrating the forehead and killing him? Was the car dealer using rounds loaded with only a fraction of a normal charge of powder? And (2) I can’t imagine the penalty if the kid was the shooter is enough more than the penalty just as an accessory for him to think leaving the damn bullet in his skull is preferable to having it taken out.
Bullet in brain? Who gives a shit.
Uh… I am as anti-criminal rights as anyone but using brain surgery to get evidence seems a bit much to me. If this was used in multiple cases the chances of someone dieing due to the zealous justice system begins to rise. If getting evidence means risking killing someone I thing it ought to be off limits, especially if no one else died in the case. But then I am mistrustful of government by nature.
And yes, the eyes look like they have had the Condoleeza Rice treatment to make them look unnatural – or to cover up a bloodshot appearance due to drugs. Either way it is uncalled for. Let the real picture speak for itself. Have they learned nothing from Reutersgate? Why is the media run by 3rd Graders? (This is probably unfair to 3rd graders.)
@magnarc
good one, best laugh today!
should have used a hollow point
The bullet couldnt penetrate his skull?
What brand of ammo? I need to know so i never buy any of it.
#12 alex
because if they can prove he shot at the used car lot owner, it’s a stiffer sentence. as it is, it’s just accessory.